-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Generative AI Companies #2763
Conversation
unicorn |
i checked the requirements including linter and lint is passing ➜ ~ npx awesome-lint https://github.com/AlexChalakov/awesome-generative-ai-companies
✔ Linting But
|
Both of those have now been fixed. Can't find any other hard wrapping in the other markdown files |
I think it's worth re-reading what hard-wrapping is. I found a lot more hard-wrapping in your files. Check all the lines yourself, here are just a few of them: Why are you quoting the description? In your case they have no value, it's better to do without them. - [Grammarly]() - "Digital writing assistant."
Fundraised $400M according to Crunchbase and DealRoom make this: - [Grammarly]() - Digital writing assistant, [$400M](Crunchbase link).
or
- [Grammarly]() - Digital writing assistant ([$400M](Crunchbase link)). it also makes no sense to group by the amount of raised money, since they are arranged in ascending order anyway |
Thank you for the feedback. I will go through all of the files and check for hard wrapping again. I have to say the the code-of-conduct.md file does not necessarily fall under this, since it is copy and pasted from sindresorhus's repository. Regarding the other comments, I can't say I really agree with them. I find value in quoting the descriptions of the company because those descriptions are directly taken from their websites/social media profiles/other pages, so it is not my thought or saying, but rather their own description of who they are. I think this is better presenting someone else's thoughts and does not put liability on me in case something is wrong. Regarding the format of the list, it consists of hundreds of companies and is increasing by the minute, so except mandatory, I would refrain from switching its format and would just leave the 'Fundraised around ... according to ...' part. Finally, at least to me it makes sense for the companies to be grouped by the amount of raised money. Those are important thresholds and I believe it's vital for some people to be able to select just the right category they want to go through. It's cleaner and more organised this way. |
there is a specific requirement in pull_request_template.md:
you have a quote at the end of the line Correct example:
|
I would recommend not using quotation marks around the descriptions. It's a common convention to present descriptions in lists without them, and it can make the content appear cleaner and more streamlined. I mean, instead of this::
use this:
|
Bump |
LGTM |
Seems legit |
Hi! Very interesting and helpful list. My suggestion: add together.ai. |
https://github.com/AlexChalakov/awesome-generative-ai-companies
It is a thoroughly researched list of companies that indulge in Generative AI with over $5MM raised as of August 2023. It is useful for the following few reasons:
By submitting this pull request I confirm I've read and complied with the below requirements 🖖
Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.
Requirements for your pull request
Don't open a Draft / WIP pull request while you work on the guidelines. A pull request should be 100% ready and should adhere to all the guidelines when you open it. Instead use #2242 for incubation visibility.
Don't waste my time. Do a good job, adhere to all the guidelines, and be responsive.
You have to review at least 2 other open pull requests.
Try to prioritize unreviewed PRs, but you can also add more comments to reviewed PRs. Go through the below list when reviewing. This requirement is meant to help make the Awesome project self-sustaining. Comment here which PRs you reviewed. You're expected to put a good effort into this and to be thorough. Look at previous PR reviews for inspiration. Just commenting “looks good” or simply marking the pull request as approved does not count! You have to actually point out mistakes or improvement suggestions. Comments pointing out lint violation are allowed, but does not count as a review.
Add Frontend GIS #2731 (comment)
Add Astrophysics Simulation Codes #2737 (comment)
You have read and understood the instructions for creating a list.
This pull request has a title in the format
Add Name of List
. It should not contain the wordAwesome
.Add Swift
Add Software Architecture
Update readme.md
Add Awesome Swift
Add swift
add Swift
Adding Swift
Added Swift
Your entry here should include a short description about the project/theme of the list. It should not describe the list itself. The first character should be uppercase and the description should end in a dot. It should be an objective description and not a tagline or marketing blurb.
- [iOS](…) - Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
- [Framer](…) - Prototyping interactive UI designs.
- [iOS](…) - Resources and tools for iOS development.
- [Framer](…)
- [Framer](…) - prototyping interactive UI designs
Your entry should be added at the bottom of the appropriate category.
The title of your entry should be title-cased and the URL to your list should end in
#readme
.- [Software Architecture](https://github.com/simskij/awesome-software-architecture#readme) - The discipline of designing and building software.
No blockchain-related lists.
The suggested Awesome list complies with the below requirements.
Requirements for your Awesome list
That means 30 days from either the first real commit or when it was open-sourced. Whatever is most recent.
awesome-lint
on your list and fix the reported issues. If there are false-positives or things that cannot/shouldn't be fixed, please report it.main
, notmaster
.Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
Prototyping interactive UI designs.
Resources and tools for iOS development.
Awesome Framer packages and tools.
If you have not put in considerable effort into your list, your pull request will be immediately closed.
awesome-name-of-list
.awesome-swift
awesome-web-typography
awesome-Swift
AwesomeWebTypography
# Awesome Name of List
.# Awesome Swift
# Awesome Web Typography
# awesome-swift
# AwesomeSwift
awesome-list
&awesome
as GitHub topics. I encourage you to add more relevant topics.Contents
, notTable of Contents
.Contributing
orFootnotes
sections.https://github.com/<user>/<repo>/community/license/new?branch=main&template=cc0-1.0
(replace<user>
and<repo>
accordingly).license
orLICENSE
in the repo root with the license text.Licence
section to the readme. GitHub already shows the license name and link to the full text at the top of the repo.unicorn
.contributing.md
. Casing is up to you.Contributing
, positioned at the top or bottom of the main content.Footnotes
section at the bottom of the readme. The section should not be present in the Table of Contents.Example:
- [AVA](…) - JavaScript test runner.
Node.js
, notNodeJS
ornode.js
.You can still use a CI for linting, but the badge has no value in the readme.
Inspired by awesome-foo
orInspired by the Awesome project
kinda link at the top of the readme. The Awesome badge is enough.Go to the top and read it again.